The (AKA the Mr Coffee Espresso & Cappuchino Maker is a low-cost espresso machine that has rather poor performance and is difficult to use. The Mr. Coffee ECMP50 looks and feels cheaply constructed from light plastic.
Front Photo
Sides Photo
Controls 1 Photo
Controls 2 Photo
Controls 3 Photo
Controls 4 Photo
Water Reservoir Photo
In The Box Photo
Lackluster performance overall, with weak espresso and poor foam. The is a rather slow brewer: we were able to make a single shot of espresso in 52 seconds, and a double in 67. That is the time from when we start tamping the beans to when the last drop of espresso hits the cup. Part of the reason for this is that it outputs less water than most, so it takes longer to brew More on how we test the brewing process. We were not impressed with the quality of the espresso that we made in our tests, which came out rather pale and with poor creama. Good crema has small bubbles that persist, but the crema on top of the shots produced by this machine had large bubbles and dissipated quickly. We don't test the taste of the shots in our tests, but we do look at the strength by measuring the TDS (Total Dissolved Solids) of the brew. This is one of the main indicators of strength: the higher the TDS, the stronger the drink. We measure the strength of both a single and a double shot, and we found that both were rather weak, with a TDS range of 3% to 3.4%. That means that this machine can produce only weak shots, which won't make fans of strong espresso happy. More on how we test the brewing process.
Espresso Shot Photo

A double espresso shot brewed by the illy Francis Francis Y1

This machine has a manual quantity control; the water keeps flowing until you turn it off. That means that it can brew anything from a single shot of just under a fluid ounce up to a triple shot. The filter only holds enough coffee for a double shot, so you won't be able to get more out of it than that. [More on how we test the brewing process.](/content/How-We-Test.htm#quantity) The performance of the at foaming milk was disappointing; we were only able to produce milk with large bubbles that quickly burst, leading to foam that dissipated after just a couple of minutes. This is perhaps why Mr Coffee markets this as a cappuccino maker rather than a latte maker, as cappuchinos use this larger foam.
Foam Photo

A Macchiato brewed by the Gaggia Accademia

Dispensing 1 Photo
The brewing process itself is fairly standard on this machine, but the controls are poorly designed. In order to start brewing, you have to press the brew button, wait for the ready light to stop blinking (to indicate the correct temperature) and then twist the control knob. This control knob goes in two directions (to brew and to steam), and if you twist it the wrong way, the lights start blinking and you have to start again. It's a frustrating process that was poorly thought through. There is also a lot of waiting, as the ssytem takes some time to heat up, especially when switching to steam after brewing, as the boiler has to heat up again. Step 1
Brewing Process Step 1 Photo
When the system is ready and heated up, press the brew button to start. The brew light will turn green and blink. When it stops blinking, the system is ready, so you turn the control dial. Step 2
Brewing Process Step 2 Photo
The espresso then starts flowing. Once you have enough, turn the control dial back to the neutral position. Step 3
Brewing Process Step 3 Photo
If you want to steam some milk as well, press the steam button and wait until the light stops blinking (this often takes some time). When it is ready, you can rotate the control dial to start the flow of steam.
Cleaning & Maintenance Photo
The requires some maintenance, with the water reservoir needing refilling every day or two, and the drip tray requiring emptying regularly. The drip tray is located under the drip grid that the cups sit on. The filters are also awkward to clean. The usual way to do this is to take the portafilter with the filter in it and bang it on the edge of a trash bin, with the effect that the puck of coffee grounds falls out into the trash and you can then wipe the filter clean. Instead, on this machine, the filter is only loosely fitted into the portafilter, and it had an annoying habit of falling out, even with the retaining clip held in place. We then had to retrieve the filter from the trash. There are no customization features on this espresso maker. Neither of these machines inspired us, but if you are on a limited budget, we would recommend that you get the Capresso. It produces better espresso and does a better job of foaming milk. Alternatively, keep saving up until you can afford to buy a better espresso maker that will make a better brew and last longer. --> --> The illy Y1 is the better option for espresso, producing a better quality of brew with better crema and strength. The only area where the is the winner is in milk & foam, because the Y1 can't steam milk. --> --> The illy X7.1 is the superior performer in most of our tests, producing better espresso and slightly better foamed milk. The only area where the has an advantage is in flexibility, because the illy has one fixed size of shot, while the can produce bigger or smaller shots as required. --> --> Priced at about $40, the looks like a bargain. It costs about the same as a cheap drip coffee maker. But its a false economy, because this device produces poor espresso and milk with big bubbled foam that disappears faster than ice cream on a hot day. Unless you are on an incredibly tight budget, you would be better off saving up and buying a better espresso maker.

Meet the testers

Richard Baguley

Richard Baguley

Contributor

@

Richard Baguley is a valued contributor to the Reviewed.com family of sites.

See all of Richard Baguley's reviews
Richard Baguley

Richard Baguley

Contributor

@

Richard Baguley is a valued contributor to the Reviewed.com family of sites.

See all of Richard Baguley's reviews

Checking our work.

We use standardized and scientific testing methods to scrutinize every product and provide you with objectively accurate results. If you’ve found different results in your own research, email us and we’ll compare notes. If it looks substantial, we’ll gladly re-test a product to try and reproduce these results. After all, peer reviews are a critical part of any scientific process.

Shoot us an email