Skip to main content
  • Features

  • Related content

  • Performance

  • Conclusion

  • Science Introduction

  • Noise Reduction

  • Sharpness

  • Video Sharpness

  • Shot-to-Shot Results

  • Other Tests

That retro-inspired design is undeniably the E-M5's hallmark feature, making it look like something straight out of your father's closet. Picking up the E-M5, you half expect to find a fine layer of dust on top. But look again—the OM-D E-M5 is a contemporary mirrorless powerhouse. We're guessing that this well-built device will have solid image quality to back its timeless good looks, but we'll have to put it through some scientific tests to find out for sure.

## Design & Usability #### The retro design of the Olympus OM-D should appeal to enthusiast photographers, but its more modern conveniences will turn heads too. Unlike today's smooth, modern camera designs, the E-M5's look mirrors the archetypical 70s film SLRs, which were highlighted by all-metal bodies with angular lines and leatherette grips. This Olympus is pleasant to hold, with a reasonably large grip, but in its slavish devotion to classic aesthetics stops short of the comparably massive protrusions you find on modern designs like the **[Sony NEX-7](** or **[Panasonic GH3](**.
The E-M5's look mirrors the archetypical 70s film SLRs.

When you pick up the Olympus E-M5, it's a little surprising how light the camera actually is. With a body made almost entirely of magnesium alloy, you'd think that it would weigh more than 15 ounces with battery and memory card. On the ergonomic front, our one serious complaint is the feel of the buttons, which have an extended travel—likely owing to the rubber seals that keep moisture and dust out. But other weather-sealed cameras don't have this issue, so maybe it's just a rookie error on Olympus's part.

Otherwise, the E-M5's body is well-designed. The controls are smartly laid out, with plenty of customization and manual control. Despite the OM heritage, the menu and controls most closely resemble the Olympus PEN Micro Four Thirds cameras. This provides the incredible level of control that PEN cameras are known for, but it also saddles the E-M5 with a byzantine mess of a menu.


The E-M5's biggest appeal is its hardware, but it offers ample of control for all kinds of users.

Many new compact system cameras are designed to appeal to current point-and-shoot users, but the E-M5 is part of a new class of cameras that aims to snag the attention of old-school photo enthusiasts. The use of the legendary OM name is a clear statement of purpose, but it doesn't mean the E-M5 behaves like a retro camera; it has all the conveniences that today's best compact system cameras offer.

Its tracking and predictive skills are pretty limited, but for subjects that aren't moving quickly, the E-M5 is capable of fast, accurate focus acquisition even in low light.

In shooting with the OM-D E-M5, the most obvious advance over other compact system cameras is autofocus speed. Even indoors, in low light, the E-M5 blazes, quickly locking onto subjects. It's a contrast-detection autofocus system, so its tracking and predictive skills are pretty limited, but for subjects that aren't moving quickly, the E-M5 is more than capable of fast, accurate focus acquisition.

Related content

The E-M5 is more than a one-trick pony, though—it also offers an electronic viewfinder, an articulated OLED touchscreen, and dual control dials. That provides the kind of control and flexibility that will allow you to comfortably leave the DSLR at home, and yet not lose a step.

Full weather sealing means you can take the OM-D out in a heavy rainstorm, shoot poolside, or roam the desert without worry of water or dust sneaking inside. Though there are only two weather-sealed lenses in the Olympus stable at the moment, we have to imagine more are on the way. An optional two-part grip provides chunkier ergonomics for those who need them, as well as a portrait mode shutter button.


Olympus has finally upgraded the sensor in their compact system cameras, and the OM-D E-M5 is the major beneficiary.

The E-M5's new 16-megapixel sensor offers a big performance upgrade. This is a massive step forward for Olympus, as the aging sensor in their PEN series was beginning to look very dated. When you're already competing with larger APS-C sensors, you don't want to get stuck using three-year-old sensor technology.

The E-M5 shows improvement across the board, especially in terms of dynamic range and high ISO shooting.

In our performance lab tests, it's clear that the move was advantageous; the E-M5 shows improvement across the board, especially in terms of dynamic range and high ISO shooting. The new sensor is supposedly manufactured by Sony and it's clear that it shares many characteristics with the stellar 16-megapixel APS-C sensor used in the Sony NEX-5N, Nikon D7000, and Pentax K-5.

Don't give Sony all the credit, though, because Olympus has improved in-camera processing, too. The results are phenomenal: sharp images, low noise, acceptable dynamic range, and decent color accuracy. The E-M5 is quite speedy, complementing its incredibly fast autofocus speed with continuous shooting at up to 8.5 frames per second. This lags a little behind the 10 fps of the Sony NEX-7, but it's faster than Panasonic's flagship GH3.

The E-M5 is also capable of capturing 1080/30p video, and we found that the camera's motion rendition was superb. Videos had great clarity, little ghosting, and few instances of visible artifacting. We did notice some trailing around our test rig's monochrome pinwheel, though. It seems that the E-M5's use of pixel binning to downsample the video signal to an HD picture creates loads of moire in any high-frequency pattern. This is very distracting, so serious video enthusiasts may want to consider the Panasonic GH3 instead. On the other hand, the new five-axis sensor-shift stabilization is especially useful in video mode, providing almost steadicam-like behavior.


The E-M5 is an excellent camera with eye-catching retro flair, and it accomplishes most of what it sets out to do.

It hasn't taken Olympus long to work their way into our hearts with their retro-inspired compact system lineup. The PEN series was well-received not only for its styling, but for its image quality and usability as well. Olympus saw a gap at the top of their product line, and their OM-D E-M5 is here to answer a question: What would happen if you stuffed modern digital guts into a 1970s compact SLR body?

The E-M5 is the first of a new OM-D line, a direct descendant of the old OM film line. It features many of the same components and controls as the PEN E-P3, but with a great electronic viewfinder, a mostly magnesium alloy body, a brand-new image sensor, and weather sealing that can stand up to rain, wind, and dust. The 16-megapixel sensor in particular is a huge leap forward, providing dramatically improved image quality at high ISOs—a serious performance issue with the older 12-megapixel PEN cameras.

This camera can finally compete with most DSLRs under $1,000. True, the E-M5 isn't setting any new performance benchmarks in a category filled with larger APS-C sensors, but we'd no longer warn you off this camera, especially given its astonishing speed. It averaged a little over 8.5 fps, with its best shot-to-shot time touching 10.5 fps territory at full resolution. The E-M5 is also quick to focus, even in limited light, so you spend less time fretting over out-of-focus shots. In fact, though the Sony NEX-7 beat the E-M5 for pure speed, the E-M5 was a better shooter for action overall, thanks to its superior focus performance.

It's not the best mirrorless model on market, but it may be the most fun to use.

Still, the OM-D E-M5's appeal goes beyond spreadsheets and lab results. Even with its occasionally frustrating interface, it's a thoroughly satisfying camera to shoot with. It's a device for people who honestly love photography, and its retro-inspired design is, as we thought when we first saw the camera, a Delorean kicked straight up to 88. It's a responsive camera that checks all the major boxes, even if it leaves some minor ones annoyingly blank. It's not the best mirrorless model on market, but it may be the most fun to use.

Editor's Note:

When we initially tested the OM-D E-M5 we noted its improved performance over previous Olympus Micro Four Thirds cameras, though we were troubled by the camera's inconsistency in our lab tests. Ultimately it wound up with a rather low score, though we were big enough fans that we named it among our best cameras in 2012 anyway.

After seeing the same sensor and processing combination in Olympus's recent MFT bodies like the E-P5 and E-PL5, we revisited the OM-D's scores and found that the initial results weren't at the same performance level. Fearing some sample variation, we elected to re-test and re-score a different unit, resulting in a much higher score that better reflects our opinion of the camera. While we fully stand by the content of this review, we regret the error and have re-scored the OM-D based on this new analysis.

Science Introduction

The Olympus PEN series has never been known for its sterling performance, utilizing basically the same 12-megapixel sensor for most of its lifespan. For this reason, we're very excited about the OM-D E-M5, which ushers in a new era for Olympus Micro Four Thirds cameras, employing a new 16-megapixel Sony-designed sensor. The result is vastly improved image quality, with far better results at high ISOs than previous Micro Four Thirds cameras. The E-M5 also gains the benefit of a new five-axis stabilization system, an extremely fast autofocus system, and shot-to-shot speeds that hover around 8.5 frames per second.

Noise Reduction

The new 16-megapixel sensor helps elevate the OM-D above previous Olympus Micro Four Thirds models.

Olympus has three levels of noise reduction (called the "noise filter") on the E-M5, along with the option to turn it off entirely. Somewhat confusingly, they also offer "noise reduction"—a long exposure noise reduction option that takes a totally dark frame to find fixed pattern noise. For our purposes, noise reduction refers to the "noise filter" option.

If you ramp noise reduction all the way to its maximum, noise at ISO 200 drops to 0.38%, which is a great rate, but it comes at the expense of some fine detail.

In testing, we found that even at the base level of ISO 200, each NR level applies some measure of noise reduction. With NR turned off entirely, the minimum noise we saw with the camera was 0.91%. That's not really noticeable in a printed image, but still higher than we're used to seeing at that level. If you ramp noise reduction all the way to its maximum, noise at ISO 200 drops to 0.38%, which is a great rate, but it comes at the expense of some fine detail.

With noise reduction totally deactivated and ISO boosted to 3200, noise crosses the 2% threshold (where it begins to become a serious detriment to image quality). With the NR low setting, it crosses 2% at ISO 6400; NR medium hits 2.03% at ISO 12800; NR high only crosses 2% at the maximum ISO of 25600. Basically, once you've hit ISO 3200, in order to get effective results you should push noise reduction up one level for every increase in ISO.


The E-M5 produced very sharp images, thanks largely to in-camera sharpness enhancement.

We tested the Olympus OM-D E-M5 with its 12-50mm f/3.5-6.3 EZ motorized kit lens. While this isn't the sharpest lens in the Micro Four Thirds stable, it still produced some great results at all but the most extreme settings. Our test images produced some MTF50 results of over 2000 at the maximum aperture, though the minimum aperture and longer focal lengths struggled relative to the lens' performance in other areas.

The Olympus E-M5 did apply some level of edge enhancement to its images, and this created a slight halo effect.

The Olympus E-M5 did apply some level of edge enhancement to its images, and this created a slight halo effect around slanted edge targets, coupled with a darker ring. Edge enhancement artificially amplifies the subjective appearance of fine details on test charts, but in more complicated scenes (such as a person's hair in a portrait), this can actually create worse images. Shooting in RAW eliminates artificial enhancement, though, and the portrait color mode uses the technique to a lesser degree than other settings.

Video Sharpness

An ugly tendency toward distracting moire mars the E-M5's video performance.

Any time we captured a pattern of more than 400 lp/ph on video, we ran into pretty serious moire. Moire causes lines to blur together, resulting in either odd wavy patterns or discoloration, depending on the subject. Much of the detail was still there, however, with our test recording 700 lp/ph of sharpness vertically and 600 lp/ph horizontally in bright light (650 vertical/600 horizontal in low light at 60 lux). We believe the E-M5 utilizes some sort of pixel binning or line skipping method of downsizing video from the 16-megapixel sensor to the HD signal, which creates aliasing errors, resulting in moire. This is a common problem for DSLRs, but it does undo a bit what are some otherwise excellent videos from the E-M5.

Shot-to-Shot Results

Impressive speed... most impressive, indeed.

The Olympus OM-D E-M5 is blazing fast—amongst the fastest compact system cameras on the market. We found that its electronically-timed focal plane shutter operated at a rate that averaged around 8.5 fps over a five-shot burst in the high-speed continuous mode, with the fastest shot-to-shot time going as low as .095 seconds. If it shot that fast all the time, it would hit 10.5 fps, well above Olympus' claim of 9—so points for honesty on their behalf.

The JPEG buffer is also quite large, able to record 16 frames at the fastest rate before slowing down to a more pedestrian speed. The camera processed those files quickly, too, though there was a delay between taking that burst and being able to refocus and shoot again.

That delay will be shorter with faster cards, but an approximately 16-frame buffer at 8.5 fps puts the OM-D above the Samsung NX200 and just below the Sony NEX-7 in terms of raw speed. Switching to shooting RAW instead of JPEG still resulted in 14 frames before slowdown, taken at approximately the same 8.5 fps speed.

Other Tests

Meet the tester

TJ Donegan

TJ Donegan

Executive Editor


TJ is the Executive Editor of He is a Massachusetts native and has covered electronics, cameras, TVs, smartphones, parenting, and more for Reviewed. He is from the self-styled "Cranberry Capitol of the World," which is, in fact, a real thing.

See all of TJ Donegan's reviews

Checking our work.

Our team is here for one purpose: to help you buy the best stuff and love what you own. Our writers, editors, and lab technicians obsess over the products we cover to make sure you're confident and satisfied. Have a different opinion about something we recommend? Email us and we'll compare notes.

Shoot us an email