To read our full review of this washer's matching dryer, the FFQE5100PW, click here.
Objectivity is paramount to our appliance reviews. With washing machines, the most important tests are washing performance and efficiency. That's because we want to answer two questions. Does it clean my clothes? And will it cost me a fortune?

It’s simplicity itself, Watson.

The Frigidaire FFFW5100PW is very simple to operate. The design is streamlined and every button on the control panel has only one function. The stainless steel interior is a nice touch.

The interior does smell. All Frigidaire and Electrolux front loader washers have a door gasket that's impregnated with deodorant. That's used to combat the mildew smell that front-loaders sometimes get when they aren’t dried out properly. It's supposed to smell like fresh laundry, but I found it overpowering. I don’t like the smell, maybe you will. Smell before you buy!

Cleaning performance is determined by using standardized strips of stained laundry swatches. Each swatch is coated with everyday household substances like red wine and dirt. After a wash test, we scan these stain strips with a light spectrometer to see how much of the stain has been removed. For more on cleaning performance testing click here

The Frigidaire Affinity FFFW5100PW displayed average tests results when compared to AHAM industry standards. The Heavy Duty cycle performed the best, especially with particulate stains like dirt and cocoa stains. The worst cycle was Delicates which was 10% less effective than Heavy Duty. Given the price point of this washer, the washing performance was acceptable.

Efficiency is two fold. First, we hooked up the FFFW5100PW to water and energy meters to calculate resource usage. In this regard the FFFW5100PW really surprised us. We determined that the yearly operating cost of this washing machine to be around $25-- $10 less than the average front loader and half of the average top loader

-->

The second part of the efficiency equation is water retention. This is the moisture that remains in your laundry after the cycle has completed. The more water that is retained the more work your dryer has to do. On average, our eight-pound test loads retained 56% of their weight in moisture. Anything around the 50% mark gets a gold star in our book, so this washer passes the test.

The savings don't stop

The cleaning performance of the FFFW5100PW was average and adequate. The lack of a Whites cycle caused us to make our own: Using the Normal cycle, we increased the temperature and added an extra rinse. Surprisingly even with the added heat, the Normal did better than Whites, and Heavy Duty did better than them all. While dealing with stains, this Frigidaire had the easiest time with particulate stains like cocoa and dirt and trouble with sweat and blood.

-->

Efficiency is where the FFFW5100PW shined. Based on using a variety of cycles, we estimate that the yearly operating cost to on the order of $25. That's about $10 cheaper than most other front loaders. Or to put it another way, an additional $100 in your pocket after ten years.

Any washer that touts the End-of-Cycle Signal as a feature could be considered minimalist. Besides sounding off when it finishes a cycle, the FFW5100PW also has Stain Clean and Energy Saver. Stain Clean adds a five-minute soak in the middle of a washing cycle and Energy Saver uses less hot water and uses a more intense spin in order to save you money.

For in-depth performance information, please visit the Science Page.

-->

You don't get extras, but you get what you pay for

The Frigidaire FFFW5100PW is a bare-bones washing machine, but the cycles and features can be stretched to cover all your needs. There’s no Whites cycle, but you can increase the temperature of the Normal cycle for optimum bleach conditions and a Fresh Water Rinse to clear it all away.

The cycles that it does have perform well enough given the price. Although there are omissions in the FFFQ5100PW’s repertoire, this machine is still a good value if you don't need more than the basics.

Meet the testers

Jonathan Chan

Jonathan Chan

Lab Manager

@ReviewedHome

Jonathan Chan currently serves as the Senior Lab Technician at Reviewed. If you clean with it, it's likely that Jon oversees its testing. Since joining the Reviewed in 2012, Jon has helped launch the company's efforts in reviewing laptops, vacuums, and outdoor gear. He thinks he's a pretty big deal. In the pursuit of data, he's plunged his hands into freezing cold water, consented to be literally dragged through the mud, and watched paint dry. Jon demands you have a nice day.

See all of Jonathan Chan's reviews
Jonathan Chan

Jonathan Chan

Lab Manager

@ReviewedHome

Jonathan Chan currently serves as the Senior Lab Technician at Reviewed. If you clean with it, it's likely that Jon oversees its testing. Since joining the Reviewed in 2012, Jon has helped launch the company's efforts in reviewing laptops, vacuums, and outdoor gear. He thinks he's a pretty big deal. In the pursuit of data, he's plunged his hands into freezing cold water, consented to be literally dragged through the mud, and watched paint dry. Jon demands you have a nice day.

See all of Jonathan Chan's reviews

Checking our work.

We use standardized and scientific testing methods to scrutinize every product and provide you with objectively accurate results. If you’ve found different results in your own research, email us and we’ll compare notes. If it looks substantial, we’ll gladly re-test a product to try and reproduce these results. After all, peer reviews are a critical part of any scientific process.

Shoot us an email

Up next