Laundry

Samsung WA56H9000AP Washing Machine Review

For top-load lovers only

Credit:

Recommendations are independently chosen by Reviewed’s editors. Purchases you make through our links may earn us a commission.

By the Numbers

Scientific testing is the foundation for our appliance reviews. On this page, we'll explain how we tested the Samsung WA56H9000AP. As with all washers, we put a strong emphasis on cleaning performance, clothes wear, and water use.

Editor's Note: On November 4, 2016 Samsung announced a voluntary recall to address consumer complaints about washers experiencing catastrophic failure during spin cycles. You can learn more about that recall here.

Certain serial numbers of this model may be affected by this issue. As such, we have chosen to rescind our Editors’ Choice award for this product until we have more information on Samsung’s plans to remedy the situation.

Want a giant washing machine that isn't a front loader? Well, the Samsung WA56H9000AP (MSRP $1,499) is the top-loading cousin to the WF56H9100AG.

Gigantism seems to run in the family. With a 5.6 cubic foot drum and a 30-inch width, the 9000 is the biggest top-loading washer you can find outside of a laundromat.

Of course, this washer is just as slow as its front-loading counterpart. Sure, Samsung advertises that this machine can wash three times the laundry in one-third the time. But that only holds true if you're stuffing this machine to the brim with laundry. It will still take an hour and a half to finish a Normal load, but that Normal load can be as large as four baskets of laundry.

This washer is designed specifically for people who wash a lot of clothes at one time, and who prefer to wash them in a top-load machine. It's easy to load and unload and has a familiar feel. However, its cleaning performance is bested by its competitors, and your water bill could be as high as $100 a month if you take advantage of all its cycles.

Related content

Cleaning Performance

In order to calculate how good a washing machine is at cleaning, we test key cycles using mechanically stained strips of cloth.

Each strip features standardized swatches that have been coated in common household substances including blood, sweat, wine, oil, and cocoa. We then place these stained strips into a prearranged load of test laundry, and put it through a wash cycle. After the cycle is complete, we take the strips out and analyze them with a photospectrometer to determine how much of each stain has been lifted.

Stains

Before and after test stain results using the Normal cycle. From left to right: control, sweat, dirt, blood, cocoa, and red wine.

The Samsung WA56H9000AP had middle-of-the-road performance. It struggled with sweat and dirt stains, which helped to sink its overall scores. We weren't impressed that the Niagara Wash's scores weren't any better than the Normal wash, even though it used much more water.

Design & Usability

As American as a pickup truck.

The shape of this washer reminds us of those Chevy pickups from the 50's, with chrome trim and rounded edges. It's an appropriate homage, since the WA56H9000AP is all about loading and unloading large amounts of laundry.

Although the drum is able to fit 5.6 cu. ft. of laundry in, it only measures around two feet deep. Samsung calls it an EZ Reach design, and says you won't have to climb a ladder, throw on a headlamp, and go spelunking to find that errant sock. However, the drum is still very wide. Since laundry tends to stick the edges of a washer's drum, it may still take some effort to unload.

Other than that issue, the WA56H9000AP is just a standard top-loader.

...one weird corner may prevent you from moving this appliance into your house

Note however, that this machine is 30 inches wide. Modern doors are 32 inches wide, and old homes may have even smaller portals. Pair this washer with its matching dryer and you'll need at least five feet of space. Be sure to measure carefully, as one weird corner may prevent you from moving this appliance into your house.

Performance & Features

Water, water, everywhere.

Some people think that more water makes for a better wash. Generally speaking, that isn't true, but manufacturers still cater to the wetter-is-better crowd with specialty cycles.

Shallow

The WA56H9000AP's drum is shallow for easier loading.

Samsung's Niagara Wash is one of the least water-efficient cycles we've ever tested. If it cleaned extremely well, we could make a case for it. But despite the whopping 60 gallons it used in our tests, it provided no better cleaning performance than the Normal cycle. If you use this cycle once a week, you'd be pulling 3,120 gallons of water a year. That's enough to fill a pool.

Across the board, this Samsung left us unimpressed with its cleaning performance. It had trouble with sweat and dirt stains on all cycles, and the Normal cycle took an hour and fifteen minutes—twice as long as some of the best machines we've tested. Even the Quick Wash cycle took 45 minutes.

For in-depth performance information, please visit the Science Page.

Efficiency

Our labs take a two-pronged approach when it comes to efficiency: We measure what goes into a washer and what comes out. Water and electricity go in, and wet laundry comes out.

Basically, the WA56H9000AP is a water hog. Many cycles used between 30 and 60 gallons of water. If you use one of those water-intensive cycles at least once a week, we calculate that this washer will cost you $115 in water and energy costs over a year. That's nearly three times what the average front-loader will cost you.

Now let's move onto what comes out of a washer: wet laundry. The wetter the laundry, the more work your dryer has to do. So the more a washer spins out, the more money you save in energy costs. In this regard, the WF56H9000AP is one of the best we've ever seen. On average, it spun out 55% of all water. Most washers struggle to get to 50%, so this Samsung gets a gold star in our book.

Conclusion

Niagara Wash falls short.

Wide load

This is the WA56H9000AP's accompanying dryer, the DV56H9000EP, which can barely fit through a 32 inch door.

Some people really need a giant washing machine. Many of those people prefer top-loading washers. Those people will be attracted to the Samsung WA56H9000AP, and won't mind paying $1,099 on sale for it.

Others should be cautious. In our tests, we found the WA56H9000AP's cleaning performance to lag behind the best machines we've evaluated. That's true even when we engaged the water-intensive Niagara Wash, which used more water than nearly any other cycle we've tested.

If those performance results make you wary, there are plenty of other machines on the market that can get the job done. For instance, Samsung's own WA50F9A8DSP is one of the best top-loading washers we've tested. It fits slightly less than the 9000 series, but we think it's a better washer overall.

Editor's Note

THIS ARTICLE WAS UPDATED ON Oct. 4, 2016 TO REFLECT NEW INFORMATION ABOUT SAMSUNG WASHING MACHINES.

Cycle Selection

We wanted to see how well this washer would treat your bright whites and cottons. However, this machine did not have a dedicated Whites cycle. After some thought, and consultation with the Owner's Manual, we settled on Niagara Wash and set it to Very High Heat.

This is because Niagara Wash has a built-in extra rinse. The two things required for a good Whites cycle are high heat to activate bleach and extra water to wash it away. In the end, the Niagara Wash fit this bill better than any other cycle.

Up next