Samsung is known for taking risks. Forward-facing speakers? Samsung's idea. The Exynos 5 processor? Samsung. But this tablet in particular isn't an expression of innovation, and that's a problem. A lack of distinguishing features really spells doom for tablets, failing to bridge the gap to laptops. You don't have to be a Roman-era diviner to rip into the guts of the Galaxy Tab 3 10.1" to know that the future is bleak for this tablet.
This new line of tablets from Samsung is one of the biggest head-scratchers out there in the mobile industry. Samsung is responsible for the hardware of last year's Nexus 10, so why not use that to its advantage? While the 10-inch Galaxy Tab 3 packs a comparable screen size, it hosts far fewer features, an extremely disappointing screen, and wholly out-of-date specs for the same amount of money.
Many of the tablet's functional and aesthetic features are either stripped-down or scaled back. Speakers that used to be on the front (a wonderful option) are now on the side. NFC is gone. You're left with a tablet that resembles something two years old in features and performance. The IR blaster to control your home theater is interesting, but hardly a reason to buy a tablet with such glaringly huge flaws elsewhere. Durability is also a concern with the cheap-feeling plastic body, though this type of plastic is generally scratch-resistant.
To its credit, Samsung held onto the microSD card slot to allow expandable storage. The ability to pair bluetooth accessories with the tablet is also useful, but extremely pedestrian as far as tablets are concerned. Honestly, neither of these features justify the amount of money you'd pay—if you want interesting bells and whistles, there are plenty of other options out there.
If it seems that I can do nothing but rip on this tablet, it's because it could have been so much better. However, Samsung seems to be moving away from making "dumb pipes" in favor of grabbing content partnerships. The goal? A tablet that prints money. It makes sense from a business standpoint, and it's something that Apple does very well by having a pseudo-monopoly. But Samsung's most recent effort is just a bad bet for consumers. This model just doesn't cut it.
Mediocre by today's standards, worse by tomorrow's
Probably the most glaring flaw is the screen. Where the same-priced Nexus 10 has a fantastic screen, this device has a bafflingly bad one. It really doesn't make much sense when you consider that for the same real estate, Samsung elected to use a 1280x800 pixel screen when it had 2560x1600 last year. Additionally, the processor is extremely poorly-equipped to handle graphics-intensive games.
Despite the three separate screen color modes, you really should just stick with "Movie" mode for the best performance. However, even this is lackluster—the Galaxy Tab 3 10.1" failed both our contrast and color tests with a narrow color gamut and washed-out image quality. Honestly, this is where cutting corners gets you in trouble, as the screen is the most prominent part of a tablet—c'mon Samsung, you don't cheap out on that.
If that weren't bad enough, usually when we see toned-down specs we get a tipoff that battery life should be a bit better: Not so with the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1". In our tests, it only lasted 4 hours and 58 minutes playing back video (5 hours, 33 minutes reading an eBook), which is far short of the mark compared to other 10" slates. It's just behind the pack across the board—it'll frustrate, annoy, and infuriate you— and Samsung wants you to pay money for that experience? Pass.
Frustrating, to say the least
Like the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8-inch, this tablet isn't really equipped with top-shelf components to carry you for very long. As more and more resource-intensive apps and media bleed out into the mainstream, you'll find that this product lags far behind even cheaper models—a tough pill to swallow.
Nothing really stands out with this tablet—processor speeds aren't great, the interface won't blow you away, and many of the measurable performance points are lackluster, or worse. Probably the biggest draw to the tablet is the brand, and the second draw is the content partnerships. Sure, the screen has okay color, but wretched pixel density makes those accurately-colored pictures look like Lego bricks. You can also expect some video stuttering if the file is too large, as the tablet must downscale some HD content—the resolution is just not big enough to handle much above 720p (1280 x 720 pixels).
Much like it is on the other Galaxy Tab 3 series tablets, the interface seems stuck in the past. While the slate does maintain some of the nicer features from Android 4.2.2, aesthetically it is a bit less clear. When you first turn on the tablet, you'll be greeted with a splash of widgets everywhere that you may not need, and probably don't want. You can remove unnecessary widgets, but it takes a while. Honestly, who needs two clocks on the homescreen?
For the interim, this tablet is fine for casual tasks. Browsing the web or flipping through photos is acceptable—and most people use their slates for little more than that, anyway. However, if you're like Mrs. Thomas, the inability to play the newest games will really stick in your craw after a while.
A friendly word of warning
The Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 is an unwise purchase. If you're looking for value, this isn't for you—you can buy better for less. If you're looking for the latest-and-greatest, the Galaxy Tab 3 lags behind other tablets—even ones released last year. This tablet has few redeeming qualities. It turns on, doesn't shock you upon use, and works (albeit poorly) for a few basic tasks. That's about it. There's only so much one can hope for with software updates, and hardware fixes aren't one of those things.
There's typically a large number of flagship releases at the end of the year right before the holidays, so I suggest waiting for October and November 2013—you'll have a wider array of better-value options.
Samsung pushed out a tablet that's "good enough" for content partnerships, but the whole innovation thing seems lost in the shuffle. Brand loyalists will miss out on Android's latest and greatest features. Do yourself a favor—if you are seriously considering buying this tablet, don't. Get the Nexus 10 or wait for the fall.
Time is a funny thing: What once was incredible can become commonplace in a few short years. This tablet would have been almost fantastical to imagine 5 years ago, but the industry has progressed so much that it seems more of a modern-day dinosaur than a flagship product. Such is the nature of the beast: No-one told this tablet when to run; it missed the starting gun.
Stuck in 2010
I'll come right out and say it: This is a notably bad screen in comparison to the vast majority of competing devices. It's worse than phones, worse than TVs, and worse than other tablets by a lot.
While it's true that resolution matters at a set distance away from your eye, it's also true that the higher the resolution, the less perceptible the individual pixels. In this regard, the Galaxy Tab 3 10.1" fares poorly, even in comparison to year-old tablets. A resolution of 1280 x 800 pixels at a 10.1-inch screen size leaves it with 150 pixels-per-inch (PPI) which is noticeably blocky.
Contrast is very disappointing as well. Though the gamma is passable at 2.4 (ideal is somewhere around 2.1 to 2.2), the contrast is abysmal. To put it into harder terms: the black level of 0.55 cd/m2 and the peak brightness of 387.8 cd/m2 only nets it a ratio of about 705:1. That means this tablet can't display a picture as accurate as most bargain-bin televisions from a couple years ago—pictures will look washed out and be poorly defined.
The screen brightness is just a bit weak to stave off the annoyance of reflections, as the tablet does a mighty fine job of acting as a mirror. Reflecting about 21.6% of all light shone on the screen and 5.6% directly right back at you, expect super-annoying glare and a sharp reflection pattern. Really this is more common than you'd expect, and not simply a failing of this particular tablet.
In fairness to this device, the color isn't all that bad—it's better than most of the low-scorers in the Android kingdom. However, compared to the top dogs it still lags behind, even with its multiple color modes. Like it is on the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8" model, the "Movie" mode is the most accurate. There's also little discernible difference between the other two color profiles. All profiles have shifted blues, and undersaturated reds and greens.
Not much under the hood.
It should come as no surprise by now that the Achilles' heel of this device is the use of outdated components, and it really shows with the processor. Getting outpaced in many regards by the $129 Hisense Sero 7 Pro, it's hard to see a universe in which you'd pick this instead of another tablet. I mean really, pick just about any other new one, and you're looking at better processor performance.
Our Galaxy Tab 3 unit scored a mere 1217 in Geekbench (averaged over multiple tests), which places its hardware performance at somewhere behind last year's Nexus 7 (1479). In comparison to other more modern tablets, this unit lags behind all the market leaders: The Sony Xperia Z (2029), Apple iPad, and Google Nexus 10 (2433) all outclass it by an enormous margin. Even the aforementioned Hisense Sero 7 Pro does a slightly better job handling tasks (1345).
I'm struggling to explain away what this could be caused by, but it's very obvious that this unit just has outdated hardware. There's nothing more to it. Despite the fact that ARM-based devices typically do not handle large jobs well, this processor lags far behind the competition—it was so problematic in our labs that it couldn't handle even our most basic graphics tests. If you like games and other graphics apps, this will make your experience intolerable. You can expect stuttering, low frame rates, and slowdown in spots—even in games like Angry Birds.
The little engine that can't.
So we figured at one point that the "clipped wings" of the tablet had something to do with trying to boost battery life. However, the assumption that Samsung eschewed performance for enabling users to have an indefatigable battery is false.
In all respects, a battery life this mediocre would be just that, but in context? Yeesh. Reading an eBook will kill the battery in just 5 hours and 33 minutes, and a movie does the job in 4 hours and 58 minutes.
To its credit, the tablet's relatively small battery does charge at an acceptable speed, but the advantage is lost on travelers if you need to constantly find outlets. Trying to boost your battery life is tough as well, given that turning down the screen's brightness won't get you much without making the picture difficult to see in bright light.
Meet the tester
Staff Writer, Imaging@cthomas8888
A seasoned writer and professional photographer, Chris reviews cameras, headphones, smartphones, laptops, and lenses. Educated in Political Science and Linguistics, Chris can often be found building a robot army, snowboarding, or getting ink.
Checking our work.
We use standardized and scientific testing methods to scrutinize every product and provide you with objectively accurate results. If you’ve found different results in your own research, email us and we’ll compare notes. If it looks substantial, we’ll gladly re-test a product to try and reproduce these results. After all, peer reviews are a critical part of any scientific process.Shoot us an email