Front Image
Controls 1 Photo
Controls 2 Photo
Interior Photo

The interior of the CDWT980VSS.

Sides Photo

Olympus SZ-31MR iHS side views

Back Photo

Michael Faraday may have created the first electrical dynamo, but it was the person who hooked a meter up to it that made the money. The tried to deny that person as much money as possible, as its Normal cycle consumed only about 122.3 watt-hours. The most power hungry cycle turned about to be the Heavy Duty cycle which consumed 160.2 watt-hours. We estimate that this washer will add about $4.55 to your yearly bill, if your costs are near the national average.

According to the General Accounting Office there about 1.4 million miles of water pipes in the United States, enough to circle the Earth 56 times. By 2013 nearly half will have to replaced costing an upwards 1.2 trillion dollars to repair. Not to worry, the won't do a number on those pipes. It is highly efficient when compared to other top loaders.

The thirstiest cycle on this GE top loader was the Delicates cycle at 15.96 gallons. The Normal cycle used about 15.74 gallons. Using national averages, we calculate that this washer will add about $37.07 to your yearly water bill.

The Whites cycle proved to be the most expensive to run at 17 cents. It only gets less expensive from there. Most people use the Normal cycle the most, which is a penny less than a dime per wash on average.

We like think of ourselves as forward thinking people. Case-in-point: We always buy green bananas. Our projections, based on national averages, peg the 's yearly operating costs at $41.62. It's higher than many front-loaders, but amongst top loaders, it ranks amongst the best.


All we ever wanted was to be normal. To make up for our lost dream, we used the Normal cycle -- known as Colors on this machine. Amongst the stains we presented this washer, it drove away red wine the most. Sebum didn't mind the washer that much and stuck around. Blood, oil, and cocoa were all removed to a goodly standard.

What makes a good Cottons/Whites cycle, you ask? Heat and water. Whites cycles run at a higher temperature to work in conjunction with bleach and an extra rinse at the end to wash it away. The did not waste this extra heat and water. It matched or surpassed most washers on every stain. Don't take our word for it -- see for yourself!

Although this Delicates cycle released clothing less worn, its cleaning ability left much to be desired. We weren't surprised, since it takes a tough wash to make a clean load of laundry.

Stains will suffer if you place them in the set on Heavy Duty. Your laundry will receive collateral damage, coming out a lot worse for wear. Taking 70 minutes to complete, the Heavy Duty should be reserved for when it is really needed.

The has no Quick Wash cycle. It has a Quick Rinse cycle which the manual recommends for non-soiled items. However, why would you put something that isn't dirty into the washing machine? Is it as silly as putting dirt into the washing machine? ...We just broke our brain.
Like the difference between grizzly bears and teddy bears, the prevailing belief is that top loaders are less gentle than front loaders. This is due to their pole agitators, which physically pull the laundry around in order to get it clean. The has no pole agitator. Instead, it has a "wash plate" -- a moving disc at the bottom of the drum that swishes around the water in the drum, and by extension moves the clothing that's floating in that water. It's more gentle than other top loaders, but only middle of the road when pitted against front loaders.
What goes in must come out, by one means or another. For the , any water that goes in must either be spun out to be drained or it'll be retained in the laundry load. That water then has to be evaporated by some means, usually a dryer.

In this case, less is more. The less water that's retained at the end of a washing cycle, the more time and money you'll save when running the dryer. On average, the left 70 percent of a test load's weight in water. Ideally, we'd like to see 50% or less. In this regard, this GE stumbled.

We calculated that the has a total of 20 unique wash cycle combinations accounting for temperature, spin speed any any special options. That's a fairly low number of settings. The Hotpoint HTWP1200DWW had over 108 settings. However, this works in the GE's favor. The simplicity adds to its ease of use. Also, the ability to save your favorite settings was a useful feature.

Controls 2 Photo

The essentially offers three additional wash options: an "auto soak" option for before the wash, a rinse tailored to adding fabric softener during the wash, and an extra rinse for after the wash.

Controls 1 Photo

The has one of the best looking detergent dispensers we've ever seen, and any mirror or reflective surface will reveal it. All joking aside, this GE has a dispenser for bleach and fabric softener, but none for detergent. As easy as it is to simply pour detergent on your laundry, it is more effective to have water wash over detergent in order to evenly coat your clothing.

Drawer Photo

The door of the , like many other top-loaders, slams. There is no slightly ajar here. Either it is completely open or gravity will take its course.

Interior Photo

The interior of the CDWT980VSS.

The was easy to use in most cases. Being a top loader and in a well lit room, we were able to open the top and see all our laundry. We were able to put our laundry basket on the same level as the door. This made it so we didn't have to get on our knees to transfer our laundry. On the flip side, if you're in a poorly lit, cramped room and trying to get wet laundry into a dryer, we can envision a scenario were the would be a hassle to use.

Turn the knob, push the button. Even without repeating a thousand times, you will know how to operate the . However, we did find that the were places on the knob for settings that didn't exist. Are they phantom cycles, or the promise of what could be?

Normally, we don't consider the noise of a washer to be an issue, but this one emanated some of the most terrifying sounds we'd ever heard. As the drum turned left and right, it creaked and shrieked with a repetitive, high-pitched wail worthy of a Sounds of Halloween, Volume 3 CD.

Controls 1 Photo
Controls 2 Photo

The physics of top loaders demands that they must put more water in their drums to "float" laundry around. The 's Normal cycle used about 15.74 gallons of water. By comparison, the front-loading Electrolux EWFLS70JIW's Normal cycle used about 11.54 gallons even though it has a .4 cubic foot advantage in capacity. In the long run, this GE top loader will probably cost a little under $42 a year to operate.

The had a strong washing performance. Red wine and oil were given no comfort when dealing with this washer. Blood and sebum proved to be stauncher enemies, but were dealt with easily enough on the Whites and Heavy Duty cycles. That being said, on the more robust cycles, the frayed clothing more than some gentler machines.

The keeps features to the minimum. In this way, GE keeps frivolous options away from this cheaper machine. Auto soak, fabric softener, and extra rinse are the only real features that this washer offers. Though it does have a useful countdown timer on its display, the washer's utilitarian nature keeps confusion at bay and ease of use on the up and up.

Meet the testers

Jonathan Chan

Jonathan Chan

Lab Manager

@ReviewedHome

Jonathan Chan currently serves as the Senior Lab Technician at Reviewed. If you clean with it, it's likely that Jon oversees its testing. Since joining the Reviewed in 2012, Jon has helped launch the company's efforts in reviewing laptops, vacuums, and outdoor gear. He thinks he's a pretty big deal. In the pursuit of data, he's plunged his hands into freezing cold water, consented to be literally dragged through the mud, and watched paint dry. Jon demands you have a nice day.

See all of Jonathan Chan's reviews

Checking our work.

We use standardized and scientific testing methods to scrutinize every product and provide you with objectively accurate results. If you’ve found different results in your own research, email us and we’ll compare notes. If it looks substantial, we’ll gladly re-test a product to try and reproduce these results. After all, peer reviews are a critical part of any scientific process.

Shoot us an email

Up next