• Related content

  • Kenmore

We had it in our labs for a week, and we put it to the test. In the end, we found that its low cost doesn't detract from overall results: Despite being an entry-level product, the 22342 exhibits stain removal that's above average. Yes, it uses a lot of water to achieve that, but that's expected from this kind of appliance.

With its pole agitator and options for cold water washing, the Kenmore 22342 delivers a traditional washing machine experience for the lowest upfront price. But its heavy water use and tiny capacity means that you might be better off spending a little more now to get a lot more value in the long run.

To learn about the matching dryer, read the the Kenmore 62342 review.
Stain removal, efficiency, and clothing wear are the most important aspects when evaluating an entry-level washer like the Kenmore 22342. We measured all three when we had this machine in our labs for a week's worth of standardized testing.
Cleaning performance is synonymous with stain removal. To test this, we use mechanically coated strips of cloth, which are divided into swatches covered in representative substances like cocoa and red wine. We place these strips in either eight or four-pound test loads made of towels, bedsheets, and pillowcases. After a cycle is finished, we analyze each strip with a photospectrometer. The stain's color (versus its "before" color) tells us how much of that stain has been removed.


This image shows a before and after of a stain strip cleaned by the Kenmore 25132.

The Whites cycle was the highest-performing cycle on the 22342. It had a 2% edge over the Heavy Duty cycle. These results are typical for lower-end washers. Whites used the most hot water–the strongest stain remover for entry-level machines. The Normal cycle came in third, lagging 8% behind the Whites cycle.

When delving into individual stains, the 22342 follows suite after other pole-agitator models. The lack of an internal water heater meant it had trouble dealing with sweat and oil stains. However, across all cycles, it powered through blood and cocoa stains.

It does, indeed, have features

In order to sell a washer for under $500, Kenmore had to make some sacrifices. That's not to say that the 22342 is completely devoid of features: There are options for single and double rinses, and a wash cycle for tap cold water. It also has a triple-action agitator to bash stains out of the clothes. And you'll know when the machine is working because, when in action, it's loud enough to hear in another room.

Related content

Real estate
Credit: Reviewed.com / Jonathan Chan

Having a large pole agitator cuts down on space for laundry.

A Deep Wash cycle is designed for people who feel that their laundry just isn't getting wet enough inside high-efficiency washers. Just remember that lots of water will dilute your detergent, and your clothes might not get as clean.

Another downside is the downsizing your capacity takes when there's a pole sticking up out of the middle of the drum, which makes this Kenmore a full cubic foot smaller than many of its top-load competitors. A small capacity means more cycles, which means less time for doing things other than laundry.

When it actually comes to using the Kenmore 22342, anyone who has used a washer in the past half century will know what to expect. It has eight wash cycles and four modifiers: temperature, soil level, rinse, and stain boost. Newcomers to the American laundry world will need to peruse the manual to find out the optimum settings, but laundry veterans will know exactly what they want.

Slightly above average, but still not enough

The Kenmore 22342 has a slightly above average stain removal score. That's great considering it's well below average price tag. However, like all traditional agitator washers, this Kenmore gets stains out with physical force. That's why a high-efficiency machine can offer better cleaning and less clothing wear. For the same price, the Kenmore 25132 (MSRP $499) stands as the next step up. It has more space for laundry and, without a pole agitator, does less damage to your clothes.

Triple Action
Credit: Reviewed.com / Jonathan Chan

A triple action agitator

Clothing Wear
Credit: Reviewed.com / Jonathan Chan

A mechanical action strip after one round with the 22342's Heavy Duty cycle

Speed is the tradeoff. The old-fashioned 22342's Normal cycle took only 42 minutes– that's 15 minutes quicker than the more modern 25132. In that time, the 22342 showed it had the chops to deal with protein-based stains, like cocoa and pig's blood. This pattern held true on all cycles, but it was particularly highlighted on Normal. Above average water usage also held true across all cycles.

The Whites cycle was the most costly to run, due to the need for 11 gallons of hot water. However, that hot water was not wasted. The Whites cycle, on the hottest setting and two rinses, showed itself to be the best the 22342 had to offer. It removed 9 percent more stains than the Normal cycle.

Although the 22342 has a low upfront cost, the long-term costs might give you pause. Based on national averages, the 22342 will cost around $56 a year in water and electricity to run. That's not bad for a traditional agitator machine. Still, over the course of the lifetime of the machine, that can easily add up over $250 more than a higher-efficiency machine—effectively negating any upfront savings.

For in-depth performance information, please visit the Test Results Page.
Efficiency isn't just about how much water and electricity a washer uses, it's also about how it uses them. Being a top loader, the Kenmore 22342 requires more water than front loaders. In fact, bases on national average costs and use patterns, the 22342 uses about double what an efficient would. A year's worth of washer is going to run you about $56. Over the lifetime of the machine, that'll double your ownership costs.

All that water usage is coupled with poor spin. An water that isn't spun out of your laundry needs to be removed by your dryer or an incredibly long time on the line. On average, the 22342 only spun out about 30% of our test load's weight in water.

It's inevitable that every time you do a wash, your clothes get a little more worn. However, the Kenmore 22342 is a particularly a bad offender. We quantified this by using mechanical action strips–standardized bolts of cloth with a set number of the threads. Placing these strips into test loads, we count how many threads come loose after each cycle.

We counted, on average, over 80 loose threads on the Heavy Duty cycle. Even the Delicates cycle averaged over 40 threads a strip. Across all cycles, we counted an average of 70 loose threads. By comparison, the best delicate cycles we've tested have shown fewer than 10 loose threads. That result means that the 22342 skews towards being more destructive than gentle.
For one year after the date of purchase, the Kenmore 25132 is covered for any defects of material or workmanship. With proof of purchase, free repair or replacement may be granted at Sears' discretion.

The "for now" washing machine

When you need a washer now and you don't have a ton of cash, the Kenmore 22342 is worth betting on. It doesn't cost much up front, has effective and quick cycles, and looks familiar.

However, if you're looking for a better long-term value, there are other machines that fit the bill. Any high-efficiency machine will pay for its price premium with lower water bills, and a larger machine will let you wash more clothes in less time. If you're standing at Sears, check out the similar Kenmore 25132—which does a better job cleaning for the same price. Both machines get similar user reviews on Sears' website.

When you combine all the 22342's plusses and minuses, you get a washer that's designed for first-time homebuyers, landlords, and people looking for a cheap replacement unit. If you have more to spend on a washer, though, we recommend doing so.

Meet the tester

Jonathan Chan

Jonathan Chan

Lab Manager


Jonathan Chan currently serves as the Lab Manager at Reviewed. If you clean with it, it's likely that Jon oversees its testing. Since joining the Reviewed in 2012, Jon has helped launch the company's efforts in reviewing laptops, vacuums, and outdoor gear. He thinks he's a pretty big deal. In the pursuit of data, he's plunged his hands into freezing cold water, consented to be literally dragged through the mud, and watched paint dry. Jon demands you have a nice day.

See all of Jonathan Chan's reviews

Checking our work.

We use standardized and scientific testing methods to scrutinize every product and provide you with objectively accurate results. If you’ve found different results in your own research, email us and we’ll compare notes. If it looks substantial, we’ll gladly re-test a product to try and reproduce these results. After all, peer reviews are a critical part of any scientific process.

Shoot us an email