Skip to main content
DEAL WATCH: Keurig K-Express | 22% off $69.99

Keurig has changed the face of coffee, and snagging one of these for less than $70 is a solid deal. Read Review

BUY NOW
Vacuums

This affordable smart robot vacuum is at its lowest price right now

Alexa, tell Deebot to clean.

This Alexa compatible robot vacuum is at its lowest price ever. Credit: EcoVacs

Recommendations are independently chosen by Reviewed's editors. Purchases made through the links below may earn us and our publishing partners a commission.

In the age of digital assistants like Amazon Echo and Google Home, turning on a light is as easy as saying “turn on the living room.” Plenty of smart robot vacuums have picked up on this ease of use and are being built with Alexa connectivity, allowing you to bring an extra dose of laziness to the dreaded chore—and you can get a great one today at an amazing price.

We spotted a discount on the EcoVacs Deebot N79S smart robot vacuum that you won't want to miss. Usually, this Alexa-compatible version of one of the best smart robot vacuums we've ever tested will run you around $249.98 on Amazon. But if you check that little coupon box below the price, you can get an extra $50 off, making it just under $200 and the lowest price we’ve seen.

Although we haven’t tested the EcoVacs Deebot N79S, we gave the Editor’s Choice award to its predecessor for its basic cleaning power and ease of use. One of our complaints was actually that the N79 wasn’t as smart-home compatible as it could have been for the price. But the new model solves that with Alexa connectivity, and is currently $30 cheaper than the original Deebot N79.

Aside from having Alexa do your dirty work, the Deebot N79S can also be controlled using a remote control or a smartphone app. This means you can easily set it to clean your home while you’re still at work, for those times when you have crumbs on the floor and unexpected visitors coming over.

Buy the EcoVacs Deebot N79S at Amazon for $199.98 and save $50

Prices are accurate at the time this article was published, but may change over time.

Up next