Thankfully, our next fix came soon. The Sharp Aquos LC-60LE650U is one of the Japanese company's new models for 2013. This is exciting news for us, but why should you, dear TV consumer, care about a new Sharp product? Let's recap our 2012 experiences with Sharp:

  • The 60-inch LE847U underwhelmed us, especially considering its high-end price.
  • The 80-inch LE844U also underwhelmed us, even if its massive size put a smile on our faces.
  • The Sharp Elite PRO-60X5FD actually impressed us, both with its performance and splendor. Regrettably, it was bested by TVs that cost thousands of dollars less.

Sharp needs to avoid mediocrity and establish itself as a contender. 2013 is a clean slate for the company, and its new LC-60LE650U (MSRP $1,499.99) needs to come out of the gates galloping full-speed in order to stay competitive. Does it? We'll be the first to tell you that it stumbles with color accuracy, but manages to excel in most other categories.

Update 5/3/13: After we published this review, we suspected a piece of our testing equipment was malfunctioning. We have since retested the Sharp Aquos LC-60LE650U, and have adjusted its score accordingly.

That suit and tie... stuff

Sharp knows how to flex its design muscles—take a look at the aforementioned Elite PRO for proof. The 650U's thin profile is attractive, but that handsome stand steals the show: It resembles the design of a 2012 LG, but instead of being a cut-out, it's filled in with a gradient of dark grey plastic. We love this design touch—it's very Timberlake. While it's not a show-stopper like the Elite PRO or high-end models by LG and Sony, the 650U can hold its own.

The thin profile is attractive, but that handsome stand steals the show.

Connections are located on the right-side of the TV, if looking from the back. All of the inputs and outputs are easy to access, even though the 650U cannot swivel. On-set controls are found on the left, directly on the TV's side. Again, we had no trouble finding these.

Sharp's smart platform is updated for 2013, but it still lags behind the competition.

Sharp's menu remains untouched for 2013. This is not a bad thing: It's very easy to navigate and offers a wealth of options to tweak. The Picture submenu includes advanced options like changing the hue, saturation, and color temperature, in addition to the basics like backlight, brightness, and contrast. The Audio submenu is just as detailed: There are options for surround mode and a bass enhancer, both of which aid the TV's mediocre sound. While bass and treble can be adjusted, there is no dedicated equalizer for specific frequency bands. Sorry, audiophiles!

A570IS-PeopleSL-ISO80-sm.jpg
Just because you can put an app on a TV doesn't mean you should.

Last year, our biggest complaint about Sharp's smart platform, called Smart Central, was its lack of apps: We counted a total of 12. What did Sharp do about this? They added eight awful games, plus Facebook and Twitter. Get it together, Sharp: Just because you can put an app on a TV doesn't mean you should. If consumers want to play a game on their TVs, they will use a console. If they want to check Facebook or Twitter, they will do it on their phones or tablets. Sharp isn't the only company that poorly implements social media into its smart platform—every smart TV brand is guilty of this.

Smart Central isn't a total rotten apple, though. It has Netflix and Hulu Plus, which are worth the price of admission if you do not own an Xbox 360 or PS3. There aren't many other notable apps, though. Pandora is new for 2013, which is great if you want to use the 650U's subpar speakers for background music.

Colors look lackluster on the 650U, although contrast and motion performance are pleasing.

If a TV is ugly, has a frustrating menu, and produces terrible audio, all can be forgiven if the picture quality is excellent. The Sharp 650U is a television that has great contrast and a near-perfect color temperature, but actual color accuracy that misses the mark. In particular, reds appear muted, while blues are slightly more vivid than they should be.

The 650U has commendable motion performance.

We're happy to report that the 650U has commendable motion performance, though. Without the assistance of motion enhancement, this Sharp handles itself adequately. Shape distortion is minimal, while blurriness isn't too overwhelming. Turning on the 120 Hz motion processing mode produces impressive results: The previously stated problems become less noticeable, plus the dreaded Soap Opera Effect isn't too apparent. Would this be a good TV for sports? Yes, it would be.

Despite an underwhelming smart platform, this is a pleasant start to the year.

The Sharp Aquos LC-60LE650U has the looks—it just needs the brains. Aside from a menu interface that offers a wealth of options, you won't find much that's "smart" on this TV. The apps that Sharp added do not make Smart Central a better platform—these new apps drive home the point that Netflix and Hulu Plus are the only reasons to use it.

If Sharp can get its act together and deliver a TV with a stellar smart platform, we'd be thrilled. The 650U handles motion very well and produces an excellent contrast ratio, although colors look slightly off. While this TV isn't going to become a reference model, it is a great choice for those in need of a larger screen.
Sharp's LC-60LE650U impressed us in a few key areas. Contrast was excellent, as was its color temperature. Unfortunately, its actual color accuracy was less than ideal, not to mention its viewing angle wasn't anything to brag about.

Above-average contrast, especially the fantastic brightness

With a black level of 0.07 cd/m2 and a peak brightness of 305.64 cd/m2 , the Sharp 650U displayed an outstanding contrast. The black level is pretty dark for an LED, plus its white level is excellent—bright enough to make watching daytime TV delightful in a sunny room. Feel free to enjoy Maury and The View to your heart's content.

While many LCDs struggle with viewing angle, the 650U does not.

With a total viewing angle of 36°, the Sharp 650U won't produce the best looking image when viewed from an angle of more than 18° on either side. We calculate a TV's total viewing angle by measuring contrast at different intervals along an arc. When a TV's contrast drops below 50% of its original value, it has reached its maximum viewing angle.

viewing.jpg

Less-than-ideal color accuracy is a letdown.

Color accuracy is one of the single most important factors in a display. Seeing content exactly the way its creator intended brings immersion—that's the reason we watch TV, right? Sadly, the Sharp LC-60LE650U runs into a few problems in this category. The most egregious error lies in this TV's color gamut. This gamut shows how accurately the 650U produces color in accordance with the international standard. Greens are flawless, but the other two primary colors are not: Reds look muted, while blues are oversaturated, appearing deeper than they should.

Reds look muted, while blues are oversaturated, appearing deeper than they should.

The transition from black to a color's peak value was also problematic. Again, green did fine in this test, but reds and blues missed some transitional colors in their ascent to peak luminance. This isn't too bad of a result, but we've seen much better.

Color temperature, which affects the overall tone of the picture, was nearly perfect. The 650U didn't produce any noticeable color temperature error, meaning that whites and greys will show up as they should—no need to worry about any blue or orange hues messing up your TV's picture.

Meet the testers

Josh Fields

Josh Fields

Staff Writer

@reviewedtech

An enthusiast of all things tech, Josh is one of Reviewed.com's resident television experts. When he's not looking at bright TV screens in a dark room, he's probably reviewing a laptop or finding a new snack at 7-11.

See all of Josh Fields's reviews
Josh Fields

Josh Fields

Staff Writer

@reviewedtech

An enthusiast of all things tech, Josh is one of Reviewed.com's resident television experts. When he's not looking at bright TV screens in a dark room, he's probably reviewing a laptop or finding a new snack at 7-11.

See all of Josh Fields's reviews

Checking our work.

We use standardized and scientific testing methods to scrutinize every product and provide you with objectively accurate results. If you’ve found different results in your own research, email us and we’ll compare notes. If it looks substantial, we’ll gladly re-test a product to try and reproduce these results. After all, peer reviews are a critical part of any scientific process.

Shoot us an email