Skip to main content
DEAL WATCH: Keurig K-Express | 22% off $69.99

Keurig has changed the face of coffee, and snagging one of these for less than $70 is a solid deal. Read Review

BUY NOW
  • Introduction

  • Color & Noise

  • Motion & Sharpness

  • Low Light

  • Conclusion

  • Introduction
  • Color & Noise
  • Motion & Sharpness
  • Low Light
  • Conclusion

Introduction

Color & Noise

{{section_header}}{{section.name}}{{/section_header}}

The T3 had slightly more accurate colors than the rest of the cameras in our comparison group in bright light video testing. It didn’t quite match up to how stellar it performed in our low light video testing, but it bettered the Pentax K-r and Nikon D5100, which both had a color error over 4. The T3i was only slightly better with a color error of approximately 3.9 compared to 3.52 on the T3. See our full color performance review, including color swatches and crops.

The T3 suffered from less than 0.6% noise in bright light video testing, which is basically identical to what we saw on the T3i. The major issue was color noise, especially in the red channel. This is very common in DSLRs, and it’s right in line with what we saw with the T3i. See our full noise performance review, including crops and comparative analysis.

Motion & Sharpness

{{section_header}}{{section.name}}{{/section_header}}

The T3 rendered motion fairly well, with its major issue being trailing across the frame. In our motion test this is most visible in the train’s face and the monochrome pinwheel. There is little signal interference or aberration visible in the rest of the motion, however, despite the video being just 720/30p. Given that this is Canon’s first sub-$600 DSLR with HD video, it’s not a bad effort. See our full motion performance review, including video clips.

The 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 kit lens on the T3 proved to be very soft in our still resolution testing and that holds true here. The camera and kit lens could manage just 450 lw/ph of horizontal sharpness, and 500 lw/ph vertically. The combination also created a pronounced moire effect with pretty obvious chromatic aberration at the highest spatial frequencies. Read our full sharpness performance review.

Low Light

{{section_header}}{{section.name}}{{/section_header}}

The Canon T3 required 12 lux of light to record an image that registered 50 IRE on a waveform monitor. This isn’t particularly sensitive, but it’s a low enough amount of light that in most practical situations that don’t involve the inside of a dark bar, you’ll be able to record usable images. Read our full low light sensitivity performance review.

Our low light video testing found a color error of just 2.39 with the T3, which is extremely accurate. The camera also had saturation that was nearly perfect. Considering the T3 produced a much greater color error both in still photography as well as in bright light video testing, we can only chalk this up to a bit of luck on the T3’s part. Still, it’s a very good result and the camera earns points because of it. See our full low light color performance review, including comparative images and analysis.

The Canon T3 had less than 0.9% noise in low light, which was slightly worse than we saw in bright light color testing. That is to be expected, as the camera ramps up sensitivity automatically in video testing, with no manual control allowed. Still, this is a very good result and lags only slightly behind what the Canon T3i was capable of. See our full "low light noise performance review":https://reviewed.usatoday.com/cameras/content/Canon-T3-Digital-Camera-Review/Video.htm, including crops and comparative images.

Conclusion

{{section_header}}{{section.name}}{{/section_header}}

The biggest disappointment we had with the Canon T3's video mode was the camera's lack of essential manual controls when shooting video. Unlike it's more expensive sibling, the Canon T3i, the T3 does not allow you to adjust aperture, shutter speed, or ISO in video mode, which doesn't bode well for those who were hoping to use this reasonably-priced DSLR as a professional video recording device.

The quality of the video produced by the camera was very good, particularly for a model that tops out with 720p HD recording, but we were dismayed by the lack of video record modes and frame rate options on the camera in addition to its lack of manual controls. When you look at the T3's overall video specs, it seems that Canon set out to make a DSLR with minimal video functionality. By doing this, Canon essentially forces any true video enthusiasts to spring for the higher-priced Canon T3i instead. It can do everything the T3 can with video, plus a whole lot more—1080p HD recording, multiple frame rate options, and access to plenty of manual controls.

To read our full conclusions for the {{product.name}} including analysis of the camera's video handling and audio options, plus see sample videos and photos, visit the full review at DigitalCameraInfo.com.

Meet the tester

Jeremy Stamas

Jeremy Stamas

Managing Editor, Video

@nematode9

Jeremy is the video expert of our imaging team and Reviewed.com's head of video production. Originally from Pennsylvania and upstate NY, he graduated from Bard college with a degree in film and electronic media. He has been living and working in New England since 2005.

See all of Jeremy Stamas's reviews

Checking our work.

Our team is here for one purpose: to help you buy the best stuff and love what you own. Our writers, editors, and lab technicians obsess over the products we cover to make sure you're confident and satisfied. Have a different opinion about something we recommend? Email us and we'll compare notes.

Shoot us an email

Up next