Credit:
Reviewed / Jackson Ruckar
The Best Reciprocating Saws of 2026
Products are chosen independently by our editors. Purchases made through our links may earn us a commission.
Credit:
Reviewed / Jackson Ruckar
Why trust Reviewed?
Reviewed's mission is to help you buy the best stuff and get the most out of what you already own. Our team of product experts thoroughly vet every product we recommend to help you cut through the clutter and find what you need.
Learn more about our product testing
Milwaukee 2720-21 M18 FUEL
This is one powerful saw. It can make dozens of cuts before its battery runs dry. It burned through blades quickly and was hard to clean, though. Read More
Pros
- Comfortable to hold
- Superior cutting power
- Long-lasting battery
Cons
- Blades don't last long
- Hard to clean
- Expensive
Bosch RS428
Because it gets its power from the outlet, this tool can cut through anything you throw at it. What it doesn't do is sacrifice precision and comfort. Read More
Pros
- Powerful speed
- Tight turning radius
- Low vibration
Cons
- Changing depth guard and blade is difficult
- Slow to power on
Porter Cable PCC670B Tigersaw
This lightweight and portable saw is comfortable to use with two hands or one. Read More
Pros
- Long battery life
- Affordable
- Lightweight
Cons
- Somewhat underpowered
Kobalt KRS 1824B-03
The Kobalt is an expensive saw but its special features make it mostly worth the money. Unfortunately, there are some limitations to its cutting precision. Read More
Pros
- Powerful speed
- Multiple cutting options
- Integrated worklight
Cons
- Wide turning radius
- Excessive vibration
Ryobi One+ P514
It isn't easy to hold this tool and turn it while cutting. Despite that, we like the integrated light and logical blade swapping procedure. Read More
Pros
- Two cutting modes
- Integrated light
- Easy-to-change blade mechanism
Cons
- Difficult to hold
- Wide turning radius
-
Milwaukee 2720-21 M18 Fuel Sawzall
-
Bosch RS428
-
Porter Cable PCC670B Tigersaw
-
How We Tested Reciprocating Saws
-
What is a Reciprocating Saw?
-
What to Know About Batteries
-
One-Handed vs. Two-Handed Reciprocating Saws
-
Other Reciprocating Saws We Tested
-
More on chainsaws and power tools
- Best Overall Milwaukee 2720-21 M18 Fuel Sawzall
- Best Corded Bosch RS428
- Best Value Porter Cable PCC670B Tigersaw
- How We Tested Reciprocating Saws
- What is a Reciprocating Saw?
- What to Know About Batteries
- One-Handed vs. Two-Handed Reciprocating Saws
- Other Reciprocating Saws We Tested
- More on chainsaws and power tools
The Rundown
- Our favorite reciprocating saws are the Milwaukee 2720-21 M18 Fuel Sawzall and the Bosch RS428.
- These versatile tools excel at demolition, cutting through various materials like wood and metal with powerful strokes.
- When choosing, prioritize comfortable grip, strong cutting power, good battery life for cordless models, and effective vibration control.
When it comes to home projects or demolition work, there are a number of tools you can use. Circular saws are great for precision cutting, but they can't cut in curves.
This is where reciprocating saws come in. From cutting pipes to fitting a window, reciprocating saws are incredibly versatile tools, which is why we put 14 of them, primarily cordless models, to the test.
After weeks of testing, the Milwaukee Fuel Sawzall (available at Home Depot for $319.00) ended up being our top pick—not too surprising since reciprocating saws are often known as Sawzalls, after the Milwaukee brand. With its comfortable grip, included charger, and superior cutting power and speed, we were impressed with its abilities to complete all our tests. Reciprocating saws can be pretty expensive, so it's important to find a good one to invest your money. Fortunately, we were largely satisfied with most of the saws we tested.
The Milwaukee Fuel Sawzall impressed us in every test.
The Bosch RS428 14 Amp Corded reciprocating saw is a beast and will happily destroy anything you care to put in front of it.
The affordable Porter Cable PCC670B held its own against saws that cost much more.
How We Tested Reciprocating Saws
The Testers
Hi, I’m Jean Levasseur. I’m a former conveyor mechanic, current property manager, and a hobbyist woodworker, in addition to being a writing instructor at a local university. I come from a family of tool-users—my grandfather was a carpenter, my father owned an excavation company, and my mother was a mechanic.
Between growing up working for my family’s businesses and then moving onto my own projects, I’ve used most tools you’ve heard of and quite a few that you haven’t. I am particularly excited to be testing Sawzalls, since I’m in the market for a new one after my 10-year-old Craftsman bit the dust.
I completed a second round of testing, building off of initial research and testing from Adam Doud. Adam is a technology reviewer and podcast host of the Android Authority podcast and the DGiT Daily podcast. Growing up, his father was a general contractor, and he spent most of my formative years in his garage or on a job site helping out. After college, he worked with his father for three years as a general contractor and electrician.
The Tests
We cut through a number of materials during testing.
The testing process consisted of five different tests, but there were some variables we needed to consider first. Only one of the saws came with a metal cutting blade along with a wood/general use blade. To remedy this, we went out and purchased blades appropriate to the tasks: Diablo Demo Demon general purpose blades, Milwaukee general purpose blades, and Dewalt metal blades.
We then tested five different cutting scenarios—nail-embedded wood, 2x4 cutting, plywood cutting, metal cutting, and for our battery testing, we included an endurance test. We conducted all testing in the exact same order for each saw. The order was: nail embedded wood, 2x4 test, plywood cutting, endurance testing for battery-powered saws, and finally metal cutting.
Here’s how we ran each test:
Nail-embedded wood
I bought two pine 2x12 boards and glued them together using wood glue. Then I drove 10 nails into the end of the wood, five into each board. After that, I clamped the wood to my work table and proceeded to cut in a downward stroke. I performed each cut four times.
Twice, I held the saw and applied pressure with my second hand. Two other times, I hung a 10-pound weight on the saw near the controlling hand grip. I used my second hand just to guide the saw, letting gravity do the work. I recorded each of the four times and averaged both sets of times.
2x4 wood
I bought several pine 2x4 boards and clamped them in a staggered fashion to my work table so that I could cut in a downward motion through three 2x4s with space in between each board. I performed this test four times, twice by hand and twice with the 10-pound weight as described above. I recorded and averaged two sets of times for each test.
Plywood obstacle course
I used an 8x4 sheet of .75 inch OSB plywood, ripped down the center (to make two 2x8 boards). I drew a 2.5 inch-wide staircase pattern to test the saw’s agility in turns. I tested each saw twice, recording the times of the cuts and measuring the turning radius of each saw. I did not conduct this test with a 10-pound weight, as that would have put undue stress on the cutting blade during the horizontal portion of the test.
Endurance test
Using a pine 2x4 board, I held down the trigger of the saw and cut downward, cutting off approximately 1-inch of wood at a time. When the battery died, I recorded the number of cuts made. During testing, I had one outlier in the data, so I performed the test a second time. Because we were testing saws with different battery capacities, we also calculated and considered how many cuts were made per amp-hour (AH) of battery capacity.
Metal-cutting test
I replaced the blades in the saws with Diablo metal cutting blades. I clamped a 1-inch diameter steel pipe, a .75 inch diameter steel pipe, and a piece of .25 inch rebar (note: measure the rebar) to a table in a horizontal fashion. I cut approximately 1 inch off the end of each piece of metal in succession, adding up the times it took to cut through all three pieces of metal (and not including the time moving from piece to piece).
I conducted this test twice and averaged the times together. We also ran through this with a 10-pound weight hanging from the saw. This test did ruin a few of the metal blades we used, so new blades were swapped in as needed, but we did make a note of which saws were roughest on blades.
What is a Reciprocating Saw?
The “reciprocating” part of the saw’s name refers to the motion of the blade—it goes in and out just like a normal hand saw. This is just a mechanical hand that moves at thousands of strokes per minute. It’s shaped a little like a Nerf gun with a pistol grip on one end, but on the other side instead of soft darts, you’ll find a blade.
Reciprocating saws are generally used in demolition work when you need something to go away. It might be a wall, it might be a door, it might be a metal pipe. Reciprocating saws don’t care. If you've heard the phrase "using a scalpel instead of a broadsword," a reciprocating saw is the broadsword in this analogy.
The bottom line is that they're handy and good at doing what they do. They’re not necessarily part of an essential DIY repairman’s tool box unless your projects involve a lot of demolition work. They're not accurate. They are powerful machines and mishandling one can lead to a very bad day.
What to Know About Batteries
When choosing a saw, you want to get the largest battery capacity that fits your budget.
One of the sometimes-overlooked decisions in buying a power tool is the battery. There are two battery numbers that matter when buying any power tool: voltage and amp-hours (AH). Generally speaking, voltage is the power rating of the saw—the higher the voltage, the more powerful the saw, at least theoretically.
Of course, a well-engineered, lower-voltage tool can still outperform a higher-voltage tool, as we saw with the 18-volt Milwaukee Fuel outperforming the 24-volt Kobalt. But voltage gives you at least a good starting place.
Amp-hours, on the other hand, refers to the battery’s capacity, or how long the battery will run before it needs to be recharged. Again, the more amp-hours the battery has, the longer the battery should power the tool, though we saw examples of lower AH batteries outperforming some that were rated higher on paper.
When choosing a saw, you want to get the largest battery capacity that fits your budget, but I wouldn’t recommend going below 3AH. Purchasing a second battery will also save you a lot of frustration down the road, particularly if the saw you pick comes with a lower AH battery. There is nothing worse than having to put a project on hold while you wait for a battery to charge.
One-Handed vs. Two-Handed Reciprocating Saws
I first saw a one-handed reciprocating saw when a plumber pulled it out of his toolbag to cut a pipe under my sink. However, I’d never personally used one, so I was excited at the opportunity to put a couple to the test.
Unfortunately, all three one-handed saws we put through these tests disappointed.
While lightweight and easy enough to control with one hand, they simply lack the power for even medium-duty work. Cutting through basic 2x4s was a struggle. Most of the tasks I put them through required me to use two hands on the saw anyway.
While they could be used with two hands, doing so was uncomfortable as my second hand was right on top of the heat exhaust fan. And, if I had to use two hands anyway, there were lightweight two-handed saws (like the Porter Cable) that dramatically outperformed any of the one-handed saws.
If you have a specific use case where a lower-power, one-handed saw would be useful, like cutting PVC in awkward spaces, then by all means, pick up the 24-volt, one-handed Kobalt. For the rest of you, just get a two-handed saw. You’ll be able to do far more in far less time.
Other Reciprocating Saws We Tested
More on chainsaws and power tools
- The Best Chainsaws We've Tested
- Chain-Mate manual pocket chainsaw review
- 8 Best Work Gloves and Leather Gloves
- 20 things that will save you money this summer
- Corded vs. cordless tools: Which is right for you?
- Here's how to clean up your home and yard after a storm
- Wildfire evacuation plan: How to create one and what to know
- The Best Wood Chippers We've Tested
- The Best Circular Saws We've Tested
- The Best Starter Toolkits
- The Best Tape Measures
- The Best Multitools
Meet the testers
Adam Doud
Contributor
Adam has been a reviewer in mobile technology and consumer electronics for six years. He is a podcast producer who hosts the DGiT Daily podcast and the Android Authority podcast. When he's not testing products or speaking into a microphone, he's biking, geocaching, or shooting video.
Jean Levasseur
Contributor
Jean Levasseur became a professional writer over a decade-long career in marketing, public relations, and technical writing. After leaving that career to stay home to care for his twin boys, Jean has continued to write in a variety of freelance roles, as well as teaching academic writing at a local university. When he's not reviewing tools or chasing toddlers around the house, he's also an avid fiction writer and a growing woodworker.
Checking our work.
Our team is here to help you buy the best stuff and love what you own. Our writers, editors, and experts obsess over the products we cover to make sure you're confident and satisfied. Have a different opinion about something we recommend? Email us and we'll compare notes.
Shoot us an email